Legallink

Most legal tools front-load the easy part: a triage form, a quick risk score. Legallink keeps walking with the user. Someone weighing whether to escalate gets a different output than someone preparing evidence the night before a hearing. Each stage has its own structured prompt set, its own outputs, and its own escape hatch to a licensed lawyer when formal responsibility is required.

The reasoning layer leans on a corpus of real cases and precedents. Users get pattern-matched comparisons, risk signals, and the likely paths similar matters took — not a freeform paragraph that sounds confident. The framing is meant to give people a basis for the next decision before they spend money on a consultation.

A user submits facts and supporting material through a guided flow. The system structures the timeline, maps comparable cases, and produces outputs scoped to the current stage — including a brief that a lawyer can pick up and run with. Anything that crosses into formal legal responsibility is handed off to a licensed lawyer; the product is guidance, not representation.

I own engineering end to end: architecture, frontend, backend, deployment, production reliability. I also run the staged-rollout gate — feature flags by jurisdiction so changes can land in one market and prove themselves before the next one sees them.

Live across five Commonwealth markets. Most current work is the unglamorous half: stability, workflow refinement, and the per-market operational details that don’t show up in a screenshot but decide whether the product is actually useful.